head to head · open source

serenity vs quasar

serenity has 33,842 GitHub stars, 3,542 forks, 739 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,674 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. serenity leads on adoption by 24% (33,842 vs 27,210 stars). serenity is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. serenity has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, quasar 14%. serenity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

serenity ★ 34K quasar ★ 27K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

serenity quasar
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 27K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.5K ⑂ 3.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick serenity if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full serenity profile →

pick quasar if

  • You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better

full quasar profile →

About serenity

SerenityOS is a graphical Unix like operating system built for 64 bit x86, Arm, and RISC V computers. It is written in C++ and released under the BSD 2 Clause license, and it lives in the open source operating system ecosystem alongside other hobbyist and research kernels. The project describes itself as a love letter to 1990s user interfaces paired with a custom Unix like core, aiming for a marriage between the aesthetic of late 1990s productivity software and the power user accessibility of late 2000s Unix systems.

read the full serenity overview →

About quasar

Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.

read the full quasar overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

serenity vs uBlock serenity vs Ladybird serenity vs chrome-devtools-mcp serenity vs monaco-editor serenity vs Zen Browser serenity vs servo serenity vs refined-github serenity vs slate serenity vs Avalonia serenity vs webtorrent serenity vs fingerprintjs serenity vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is serenity or quasar more popular?

serenity has 33,842 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. serenity has the larger community by that measure.

Are serenity and quasar free?

Both are open source. serenity is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between serenity and quasar?

serenity is written in C++ and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, serenity or quasar?

Choose serenity if you want the larger community (33,842 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.