head to head · open source
quasar vs NooBox
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. NooBox has 522 stars, 54 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. quasar leads on adoption by 5,112% (27,207 vs 522 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; NooBox is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, NooBox 10%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | NooBox | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 522 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2025-11-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 54 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NooBox if
- You want the NooBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and NooBox fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About NooBox
Noobox 二箱(简) 二箱(繁) Table Of Content Installation Functionalities Search By Image Extract Images Auto Refresh HTML5 Video Control (Abort) License Language Installation Chrome Web Stroe CRX Download How to Install CRX ? Setting More Tools Extension Open Developer Mode Drag CRX File Search By Image "If you’ve stumbled across an image on the internet—perhaps on your favorite social media site—and you want to know more about it, you can always ask the person responsible for the post. Odds are good that they probably just cribbed the image from somewhere else, and don’t know any more about where it came from. But…
read the full NooBox overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or NooBox more popular?
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and NooBox has 522. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and NooBox free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and NooBox under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and NooBox?
quasar is written in JavaScript and NooBox in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or NooBox?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NooBox if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.