head to head · open source
quasar vs nebula
quasar has 27,210 GitHub stars, 3,674 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nebula has 12,395 stars, 1,330 forks, 678 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 120% (27,210 vs 12,395 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; nebula is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. quasar has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, nebula 11%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | nebula | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nebula if
- You want the nebula feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and nebula fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.
read the full quasar overview →
About nebula
NebulaGraph is an open source, distributed graph database written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the graph database ecosystem and appears in the CNCF Database Landscape. The project describes itself as symmetrically distributed, with storage and computing separated into distinct layers, horizontal scalability across nodes, strong data consistency enforced through the RAFT protocol, an OpenCypher compatible query language, role based access control, and a set of graph analytics algorithms. It has been developed for roughly eight years and carries 12,387 stars, 1,330 forks, and 678 op…
read the full nebula overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or nebula more popular?
quasar has 27,210 GitHub stars and nebula has 12,395. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and nebula free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and nebula under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and nebula?
quasar is written in JavaScript and nebula in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or nebula?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,210 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nebula if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.