head to head · open source
quasar vs GPT-Conversation-Toolkit
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. GPT-Conversation-Toolkit has 973 stars, 30 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 2,696% (27,207 vs 973 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; GPT-Conversation-Toolkit is written in JavaScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, GPT-Conversation-Toolkit 3%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | GPT-Conversation-Toolkit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 973 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 30 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GPT-Conversation-Toolkit if
- You want the GPT-Conversation-Toolkit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and GPT-Conversation-Toolkit fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About GPT-Conversation-Toolkit
ChatGPT Conversation Toolkit 🧰✨ 简体中文 English 适用于 ChatGPT Web 的浏览器插件，主要解决导出、搜索、Prompt 管理、时间线定位、对话文件夹管理和多语言界面切换问题 🚀 当前活跃维护者： bujue3709 （主要 / 唯一活跃维护者） 当前版本： v1.4.3 v1.4.3 更新内容（2026 09 17）🆕 新增 .png 长图导出。 PNG 基于完整会话导出数据生成，不依赖当前视口 DOM；API 不可用时仍会明确提示仅包含当前可获得的已加载/缓存消息。 固定 1080px 白底阅读版式，保留标题、段落、标题、粗体、行内代码、代码块、引用、列表、分隔线和基础表格可读性。 超长会话会在消息之间优先自动分页；单条超长消息才会按内容结构拆分，并使用 User · continued / ChatGPT · continued 标记续页。 多页文件按 part 01 、 part 02 顺序生成并下载；每次只创建一张大 Canvas，转为 PNG Blob 后立即释放，再处理下一页。 增加生成进度、重复任务锁和数据获取/图片渲染/内容过大/未知错误分类提示。 ChatGPT 虚拟化列表影响说明（重要） 从近期版本开始，ChatGPT Web 在会话主区采用“虚拟化列表”渲染： 浏览器中只保留当前视口附近的一部分消息 DOM。…
read the full GPT-Conversation-Toolkit overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or GPT-Conversation-Toolkit more popular?
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and GPT-Conversation-Toolkit has 973. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and GPT-Conversation-Toolkit free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and GPT-Conversation-Toolkit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and GPT-Conversation-Toolkit?
quasar is written in JavaScript and GPT-Conversation-Toolkit in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or GPT-Conversation-Toolkit?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GPT-Conversation-Toolkit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.