head to head · open source
quasar vs emacs-application-framework
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. emacs-application-framework has 3,488 stars, 245 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 680% (27,211 vs 3,488 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; emacs-application-framework is written in Python under GPL-3.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, emacs-application-framework 7%. quasar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | emacs-application-framework | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 3.5K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 245 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick emacs-application-framework if
- You want the emacs-application-framework feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and emacs-application-framework fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.
read the full quasar overview →
About emacs-application-framework
Emacs Application Framework (EAF) is a free/libre, open source framework that extends the graphical capabilities of Emacs, built for hackers who work with numerous languages and text, are keyboard driven, and want maximum freedom, extensibility, and introspectivity over their tools — potentially to the point of living in Emacs.
read the full emacs-application-framework overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or emacs-application-framework more popular?
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and emacs-application-framework has 3,488. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and emacs-application-framework free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and emacs-application-framework under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and emacs-application-framework?
quasar is written in JavaScript and emacs-application-framework in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or emacs-application-framework?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose emacs-application-framework if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.