head to head · open source
quasar vs chatGPTBox
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. chatGPTBox has 10,756 stars, 874 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar leads on adoption by 153% (27,211 vs 10,756 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; chatGPTBox is written in JavaScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, chatGPTBox 8%. chatGPTBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | chatGPTBox | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 874 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatGPTBox if
- You want the chatGPTBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and chatGPTBox fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.
read the full quasar overview →
About chatGPTBox
chatGPTBox is a free, MIT licensed browser extension that puts deep ChatGPT and multi model AI integration into Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, and Android, aimed at people who want assistant features on any page rather than in a separate tab.
read the full chatGPTBox overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or chatGPTBox more popular?
quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and chatGPTBox has 10,756. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and chatGPTBox free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and chatGPTBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and chatGPTBox?
quasar is written in JavaScript and chatGPTBox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or chatGPTBox?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chatGPTBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.