head to head · open source
quasar vs chatGPTBox
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. chatGPTBox has 10,773 stars, 881 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. quasar leads on adoption by 153% (27,207 vs 10,773 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; chatGPTBox is written in JavaScript under MIT. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, chatGPTBox 8%. chatGPTBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quasar | chatGPTBox | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 27K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 881 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quasar if
- You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatGPTBox if
- You want the chatGPTBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and chatGPTBox fits your workflow better
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
About chatGPTBox
ChatGPTBox Deep ChatGPT integrations in your browser, completely for free. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [ ][release url] [![verify][verify image]][verify url] [![coverage][coverage image]][coverage url] English Indonesia 简体中文 日本語 Türkçe Install [![Chrome][Chrome image]][Chrome url] [![Edge][Edge image]][Edge url] [![Firefox][Firefox image]][Firefox url] [![Safari][Safari image]][Safari url] [![Android][Android image]][Android url] [![GitHub][Github image]][Github url] Guide Preview [Development & Contributing][dev url] Video Demonstration Credits [dev url]…
read the full chatGPTBox overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quasar or chatGPTBox more popular?
quasar has 27,207 GitHub stars and chatGPTBox has 10,773. quasar has the larger community by that measure.
Are quasar and chatGPTBox free?
Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and chatGPTBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quasar and chatGPTBox?
quasar is written in JavaScript and chatGPTBox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quasar or chatGPTBox?
Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,207 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chatGPTBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.