head to head · open source

quasar vs aliasvault

quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars, 3,672 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. aliasvault has 3,131 stars, 107 forks, 179 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar leads on adoption by 769% (27,211 vs 3,131 stars). quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT; aliasvault is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. quasar has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, aliasvault 3%. aliasvault was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

quasar ★ 27K aliasvault ★ 3.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

quasar aliasvault
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 3.1K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick quasar if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full quasar profile →

pick aliasvault if

  • You want the aliasvault feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and aliasvault fits your workflow better

full aliasvault profile →

About quasar

Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed Vue.js framework that builds responsive single page apps, server side rendered and statically generated sites, progressive web apps, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps, and Electron desktop apps from a single codebase.

read the full quasar overview →

About aliasvault

AliasVault is a privacy first password manager and email alias manager. It is an open source TypeScript project, released under AGPL 3.0, and designed to be self hosted. It lives in the Productivity & Utilities and Browsers & Extensions ecosystem.

read the full aliasvault overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

quasar vs uBlock quasar vs Ladybird quasar vs chrome-devtools-mcp quasar vs monaco-editor quasar vs Zen Browser quasar vs servo quasar vs serenity quasar vs refined-github quasar vs slate quasar vs Avalonia quasar vs webtorrent quasar vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is quasar or aliasvault more popular?

quasar has 27,211 GitHub stars and aliasvault has 3,131. quasar has the larger community by that measure.

Are quasar and aliasvault free?

Both are open source. quasar is licensed under MIT and aliasvault under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between quasar and aliasvault?

quasar is written in JavaScript and aliasvault in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, quasar or aliasvault?

Choose quasar if you want the larger community (27,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose aliasvault if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.