head to head · open source

compose vs puppetry

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. puppetry has 888 stars, 127 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. compose leads on adoption by 4,201% (38,195 vs 888 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; puppetry is written in JavaScript under MIT. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, puppetry 14%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K puppetry ★ 888 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose puppetry
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 888
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-19
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 127
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick puppetry if

  • You want the puppetry feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and puppetry fits your workflow better

full puppetry profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About puppetry

Puppetry is a no code/low code end to end web testing tool built on top of Puppeteer and Jest, aimed at QA engineers, testers, and developers who want to record and manage browser tests through a UI instead of writing scripts — though the project is now officially deprecated and kept only as an example and a piece of its own history.

read the full puppetry overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or puppetry more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and puppetry has 888. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and puppetry free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and puppetry under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and puppetry?

compose is written in Go and puppetry in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or puppetry?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose puppetry if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.