head to head · open source

openebs vs burrito

openebs has 9,813 GitHub stars, 983 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped today. burrito has 754 stars, 67 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openebs leads on adoption by 1,201% (9,813 vs 754 stars). openebs is written in various languages under Apache-2.0; burrito is written in Go under Apache-2.0. openebs has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, burrito 9%. openebs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openebs ★ 9.8K burrito ★ 754 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openebs burrito
GitHub stars ★ 9.8K ★ 754
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 983 ⑂ 67
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openebs if

  • You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openebs profile →

pick burrito if

  • You want the burrito feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and burrito fits your workflow better

full burrito profile →

About openebs

OpenEBS is an open source, CNCF Sandbox container native storage platform that gives Kubernetes stateful applications persistent volumes through containerized storage controllers, and it is aimed at platform, infrastructure, and DevOps teams that run stateful workloads on Kubernetes.

read the full openebs overview →

About burrito

Burrito is open source Apache 2.0 Kubernetes Operator, written Go, that watches Terraform, OpenTofu, and Terragrunt code continuously and plans or applies it, sold by maintainers as "Argo CD for Terraform" and aimed at platform and infrastructure teams that already run Terraform and Kubernetes but have no GitOps control loop for state drift.

read the full burrito overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

openebs vs kubernetes openebs vs Docker openebs vs kong openebs vs portainer openebs vs trivy openebs vs OpenTofu openebs vs jenkins openebs vs Pulumi openebs vs floci openebs vs argo-cd openebs vs sops openebs vs wtf

Frequently asked questions

Is openebs or burrito more popular?

openebs has 9,813 GitHub stars and burrito has 754. openebs has the larger community by that measure.

Are openebs and burrito free?

Both are open source. openebs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and burrito under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openebs and burrito?

openebs is written in various languages and burrito in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openebs or burrito?

Choose openebs if you want the larger community (9,813 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose burrito if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.