head to head · open source

wtf vs openebs

wtf has 17,095 GitHub stars, 864 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. openebs has 9,813 stars, 983 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped today. wtf leads on adoption by 74% (17,095 vs 9,813 stars). wtf is written in Go under MPL-2.0; openebs is written in various languages under Apache-2.0. wtf has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, openebs 10%. openebs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wtf ★ 17K openebs ★ 9.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

wtf openebs
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 9.8K
License MPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 864 ⑂ 983
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wtf if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wtf profile →

pick openebs if

  • You want the openebs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • You evaluated both and openebs fits your workflow better

full openebs profile →

About wtf

WTF (also known as wtfutil) is a free, open source personal information dashboard that runs in the terminal, built for developers and technical people who want at a glance access to important but infrequently consulted data without leaving the command line.

read the full wtf overview →

About openebs

OpenEBS is an open source, CNCF Sandbox container native storage platform that gives Kubernetes stateful applications persistent volumes through containerized storage controllers, and it is aimed at platform, infrastructure, and DevOps teams that run stateful workloads on Kubernetes.

read the full openebs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

wtf vs kubernetes wtf vs Docker wtf vs kong wtf vs portainer wtf vs trivy wtf vs OpenTofu wtf vs jenkins wtf vs Pulumi wtf vs floci wtf vs argo-cd wtf vs sops wtf vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is wtf or openebs more popular?

wtf has 17,095 GitHub stars and openebs has 9,813. wtf has the larger community by that measure.

Are wtf and openebs free?

Both are open source. wtf is licensed under MPL-2.0 and openebs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wtf and openebs?

wtf is written in Go and openebs in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wtf or openebs?

Choose wtf if you want the larger community (17,095 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose openebs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.