head to head · open source

Pulumi vs openebs

Pulumi has 25,705 GitHub stars, 1,430 forks, 2,419 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openebs has 9,813 stars, 983 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped today. Pulumi leads on adoption by 162% (25,705 vs 9,813 stars). Pulumi is written in Go under Apache-2.0; openebs is written in various languages under Apache-2.0. Pulumi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, openebs 10%. openebs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pulumi ★ 26K openebs ★ 9.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pulumi openebs
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 9.8K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 983
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pulumi if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pulumi profile →

pick openebs if

  • You want the openebs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • You evaluated both and openebs fits your workflow better

full openebs profile →

About Pulumi

Pulumi is an open source infrastructure as code tool that lets teams define and deploy cloud infrastructure using general purpose programming languages instead of YAML, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and agents working across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

read the full Pulumi overview →

About openebs

OpenEBS is an open source, CNCF Sandbox container native storage platform that gives Kubernetes stateful applications persistent volumes through containerized storage controllers, and it is aimed at platform, infrastructure, and DevOps teams that run stateful workloads on Kubernetes.

read the full openebs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Pulumi vs kubernetes Pulumi vs Docker Pulumi vs kong Pulumi vs portainer Pulumi vs trivy Pulumi vs OpenTofu Pulumi vs jenkins Pulumi vs floci Pulumi vs argo-cd Pulumi vs sops Pulumi vs wtf Pulumi vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is Pulumi or openebs more popular?

Pulumi has 25,705 GitHub stars and openebs has 9,813. Pulumi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pulumi and openebs free?

Both are open source. Pulumi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openebs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pulumi and openebs?

Pulumi is written in Go and openebs in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pulumi or openebs?

Choose Pulumi if you want the larger community (25,705 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openebs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.