head to head · open source
open-code-review vs brooks-lint
open-code-review has 48,163 GitHub stars, 3,526 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. brooks-lint has 1,542 stars, 72 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-code-review leads on adoption by 3,023% (48,163 vs 1,542 stars). open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0; brooks-lint is written in HTML under MIT. open-code-review has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, brooks-lint 5%. brooks-lint was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agent-skills, code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-code-review | brooks-lint | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.5K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-code-review if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick brooks-lint if
- You want the brooks-lint feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and brooks-lint fits your workflow better
About open-code-review
OpenCodeReview English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 Русский What is Open Code Review? Open Code Review is an AI powered code review CLI tool. It originated as Alibaba Group's internal official AI code review assistant — over the past two years, it has served tens of thousands of developers and identified millions of code defects. After thorough validation at massive scale, we incubated it into an open source project for the community. Simply configure a model endpoint to get started. It reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM via an agent with tool use capabilities, and generates structured review comments…
read the full open-code-review overview →
About brooks-lint
brooks lint AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books. Consistent. Traceable. Actionable. English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español Quick Start • The Six Decay Risks • What It Looks Like • Benchmark • Installation → Visit the website "The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned." — Frederick Brooks, The Mythical Man Month (1975) 50 years later, Brooks was still right — and so were McConnell, Fowler, Martin, Hunt & Thomas, Evans, Ousterhout, Winters, Meszaros, Osherove, Feathers, and the Google Testing team. Most code quality tools count lines and…
read the full brooks-lint overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-code-review or brooks-lint more popular?
open-code-review has 48,163 GitHub stars and brooks-lint has 1,542. open-code-review has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-code-review and brooks-lint free?
Both are open source. open-code-review is licensed under Apache-2.0 and brooks-lint under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-code-review and brooks-lint?
open-code-review is written in Go and brooks-lint in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-code-review or brooks-lint?
Choose open-code-review if you want the larger community (48,163 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose brooks-lint if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.