head to head · open source
open-code-review vs reviewdog
open-code-review has 49,287 GitHub stars, 3,614 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. reviewdog has 9,716 stars, 512 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-code-review leads on adoption by 407% (49,287 vs 9,716 stars). open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. open-code-review has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. open-code-review was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-code-review | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.6K | ⑂ 512 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-code-review if
- You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About open-code-review
OpenCodeReview English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 Русский What is Open Code Review? Open Code Review is an AI powered code review CLI tool. It originated as Alibaba Group's internal official AI code review assistant — over the past two years, it has served tens of thousands of developers and identified millions of code defects. After thorough validation at massive scale, we incubated it into an open source project for the community. Simply configure a model endpoint to get started. It reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM via an agent with tool use capabilities, and generates structured review comments…
read the full open-code-review overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog A code review dog who keeps your codebase healthy. reviewdog provides a way to post review comments to code hosting services, such as GitHub, automatically by integrating with any linter tools with ease. It uses an output of lint tools and posts them as a comment if findings are in the diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in the local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. design doc Table of Contents Installation Input Format 'errorformat' Available pre defined 'errorformat' Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RDFormat) Diff checkstyle format SARIF format Code…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-code-review or reviewdog more popular?
open-code-review has 49,287 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,716. open-code-review has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-code-review and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. open-code-review is licensed under Apache-2.0 and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-code-review and reviewdog?
open-code-review is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-code-review or reviewdog?
Choose open-code-review if you want the larger community (49,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.