head to head · open source
open-code-review vs reviewdog
open-code-review has 34,427 GitHub stars, 2,452 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. reviewdog has 9,597 stars, 494 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-code-review leads on adoption by 259% (34,427 vs 9,597 stars). open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. open-code-review has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. open-code-review was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-code-review | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 34K | ★ 9.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.5K | ⑂ 494 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-code-review if
- You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About open-code-review
Open Code Review is an Apache 2.0, Go based AI code review CLI that reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM through a tool using agent, and returns line level review comments, built for developers and platform teams that want large scale review automated inside infrastructure they control.
read the full open-code-review overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog is an automated code review tool written in Go and released under the MIT license. It lives in the version control and collaboration space of the developer tooling ecosystem, and it integrates with code analysis tools regardless of programming language. Rather than performing analysis itself, reviewdog consumes the output of existing linters and static analysis tools and turns those findings into review comments on code hosting services. The project has been published for roughly ten years, carries more than nine thousand stars and close to five hundred forks, and its topic list covers CI, linting, stat…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-code-review or reviewdog more popular?
open-code-review has 34,427 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,597. open-code-review has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-code-review and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. open-code-review is licensed under Apache-2.0 and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-code-review and reviewdog?
open-code-review is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-code-review or reviewdog?
Choose open-code-review if you want the larger community (34,427 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.