head to head · open source

one vs flint

one has 1,745 GitHub stars, 533 forks, 771 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. flint has 1,709 stars, 106 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. one leads on adoption by 2% (1,745 vs 1,709 stars). one is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; flint is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. one has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, flint 6%. one was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (cloud, kvm, orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

one ★ 1.7K flint ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

one flint
GitHub stars ★ 1.7K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 533 ⑂ 106
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick one if

  • You weight community size — 1.7K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full one profile →

pick flint if

  • You want the flint feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and flint fits your workflow better

full flint profile →

About one

OpenNebula is an open source cloud management platform, licensed under Apache 2.0, for building and operating private clouds, edge infrastructures, distributed cloud deployments, and AI Factories.

read the full one overview →

About flint

Flint is a lightweight, self contained management tool for Linux virtual machines running on KVM and libvirt, built for developers, sysadmins, and home lab operators who want a web UI, a CLI, and an API without editing XML by hand.

read the full flint overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

one vs ansible one vs compose one vs conductor one vs xxl-job one vs gitleaks one vs Kestra one vs haystack one vs rancher one vs Prefect one vs Archon one vs Temporal one vs rowboat

Frequently asked questions

Is one or flint more popular?

one has 1,745 GitHub stars and flint has 1,709. one has the larger community by that measure.

Are one and flint free?

Both are open source. one is licensed under Apache-2.0 and flint under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between one and flint?

one is written in JavaScript and flint in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, one or flint?

Choose one if you want the larger community (1,745 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose flint if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.