head to head · open source

Kestra vs one

Kestra has 28,181 GitHub stars, 3,005 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. one has 1,745 stars, 533 forks, 771 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Kestra leads on adoption by 1,515% (28,181 vs 1,745 stars). Kestra is written in Java under Apache-2.0; one is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Kestra has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, one 31%. Kestra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kestra ★ 28K one ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kestra one
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 533
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kestra if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kestra profile →

pick one if

  • You want the one feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and one fits your workflow better

full one profile →

About Kestra

Kestra is an open source, event driven orchestration platform for data, AI, and infrastructure workflows. It operates in the Java based ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The project provides a unified interface for both scheduled and real time automation, supporting declarative workflow definitions in YAML while also offering visual and AI assisted authoring.

read the full Kestra overview →

About one

OpenNebula is an open source cloud management platform, licensed under Apache 2.0, for building and operating private clouds, edge infrastructures, distributed cloud deployments, and AI Factories.

read the full one overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra ansible vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Kestra vs ansible Kestra vs compose Kestra vs conductor Kestra vs xxl-job Kestra vs gitleaks Kestra vs haystack Kestra vs rancher Kestra vs Prefect Kestra vs Archon Kestra vs Temporal Kestra vs rowboat Kestra vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is Kestra or one more popular?

Kestra has 28,181 GitHub stars and one has 1,745. Kestra has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kestra and one free?

Both are open source. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and one under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kestra and one?

Kestra is written in Java and one in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kestra or one?

Choose Kestra if you want the larger community (28,181 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose one if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.