head to head · open source

compose vs one

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. one has 1,745 stars, 533 forks, 771 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 2,089% (38,195 vs 1,745 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; one is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, one 31%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K one ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose one
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 533
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick one if

  • You want the one feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and one fits your workflow better

full one profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About one

OpenNebula is an open source cloud management platform, licensed under Apache 2.0, for building and operating private clouds, edge infrastructures, distributed cloud deployments, and AI Factories.

read the full one overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or one more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and one has 1,745. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and one free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and one under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and one?

compose is written in Go and one in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or one?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose one if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.