head to head · open source
NocoDB vs risingwave
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. risingwave has 9,330 stars, 838 forks, 1,687 open issues and last shipped today. NocoDB leads on adoption by 597% (65,002 vs 9,330 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; risingwave is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, risingwave 9%. risingwave was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | risingwave | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 9.3K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 838 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick risingwave if
- You want the risingwave feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and risingwave fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About risingwave
RisingWave is an Apache 2.0, Rust written event streaming platform for agentic AI that continuously ingests data from databases, event streams and webhooks, processes it incrementally, and serves fresh results at low latency, and it is aimed at teams building agents, real time applications and streaming data pipelines that need always current, queryable data.
read the full risingwave overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or risingwave more popular?
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and risingwave has 9,330. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and risingwave free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and risingwave is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and risingwave?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and risingwave in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or risingwave?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose risingwave if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.