head to head · open source
NocoDB vs RedisShake
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars, 5,055 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. RedisShake has 4,434 stars, 780 forks, 153 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,366% (65,002 vs 4,434 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; RedisShake is written in Go under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, RedisShake 18%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | RedisShake | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 780 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick RedisShake if
- You want the RedisShake feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and RedisShake fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About RedisShake
RedisShake is an MIT licensed, Go based data processing and migration tool that moves data between Valkey and Redis deployments, built for operators and platform teams relocating standalone instances, clusters, or cloud hosted Redis compatible services without taking the source offline.
read the full RedisShake overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or RedisShake more popular?
NocoDB has 65,002 GitHub stars and RedisShake has 4,434. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and RedisShake free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and RedisShake is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and RedisShake?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and RedisShake in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or RedisShake?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,002 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose RedisShake if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.