head to head · open source
NocoDB vs oxigraph
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. oxigraph has 1,912 stars, 173 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 3,299% (64,998 vs 1,912 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; oxigraph is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, oxigraph 9%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | oxigraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 173 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oxigraph if
- You want the oxigraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and oxigraph fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About oxigraph
Oxigraph is an open source graph database and an RDF and SPARQL toolkit. It is written in Rust, released under the Apache 2.0 license, and lives in the RDF and SPARQL ecosystem. Its stated goal is to provide a compliant, safe, and fast graph database based on the RocksDB key value store, while also offering utilities for basic RDF manipulation and for building SPARQL implementations.
read the full oxigraph overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or oxigraph more popular?
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and oxigraph has 1,912. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and oxigraph free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and oxigraph is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and oxigraph?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and oxigraph in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or oxigraph?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose oxigraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.