head to head · open source

NocoDB vs Mathesar

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mathesar has 5,124 stars, 485 forks, 317 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,169% (64,998 vs 5,124 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Mathesar is written in Svelte under GPL-3.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Mathesar 9%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (airtable-alternative, automatic-api, postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K Mathesar ★ 5.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB Mathesar
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 5.1K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Svelte
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 485
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick Mathesar if

  • You want the Mathesar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Svelte
  • You evaluated both and Mathesar fits your workflow better

full Mathesar profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About Mathesar

Mathesar is a self hosted, open source web application that provides a spreadsheet like interface for PostgreSQL databases, designed for users of all technical skill levels to view, edit, query, and collaborate on data without writing code.

read the full Mathesar overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or Mathesar more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and Mathesar has 5,124. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and Mathesar free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and Mathesar is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and Mathesar?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and Mathesar in Svelte. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or Mathesar?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Mathesar if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.