head to head · open source
NocoDB vs juicefs
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars, 5,131 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. juicefs has 14,613 stars, 1,332 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 348% (65,408 vs 14,613 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 15K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick juicefs if
- You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…
read the full NocoDB overview →
About juicefs
JuiceFS is a high performance POSIX file system released under Apache License 2.0, particularly designed for the cloud native environment. The data, stored via JuiceFS, will be persisted in Object Storage (e.g. Amazon S3) , and the corresponding metadata can be persisted in various compatible database engines such as Redis, MySQL, and TiKV based on the scenarios and requirements. With JuiceFS, massive cloud storage can be directly connected to big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and various application platforms in production environments. Without modifying code, the massive cloud storage can be…
read the full juicefs overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or juicefs more popular?
NocoDB has 65,408 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,613. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and juicefs free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and juicefs is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and juicefs?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or juicefs?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,408 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.