head to head · open source
NocoDB vs juicefs
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. juicefs has 14,436 stars, 1,288 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 350% (64,998 vs 14,436 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 14K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick juicefs if
- You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About juicefs
JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.
read the full juicefs overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or juicefs more popular?
NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,436. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and juicefs free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and juicefs is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and juicefs?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or juicefs?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.