head to head · open source

NocoDB vs graphqlite

NocoDB has 65,531 GitHub stars, 5,139 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphqlite has 532 stars, 34 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 12,218% (65,531 vs 532 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; graphqlite is written in C under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, graphqlite 6%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 66K graphqlite ★ 532 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB graphqlite
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 532
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-11-14 2026-11-10
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick graphqlite if

  • You want the graphqlite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and graphqlite fits your workflow better

full graphqlite profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is the fastest and easiest way to build databases online. Website • Discord • Community • Twitter • Reddit • Documentation See other languages » Join Our Community Installation Docker with SQLite Docker with PG Auto upstall Auto upstall is a single command that sets up NocoDB on a server for production usage. Behind the scenes it auto generates docker compose for you. bash bash install.nocodb.com/noco.sh script can be found here in our github Other Methods Binaries are only for quick testing locally. When running locally access nocodb by visiting: For more installation methods, please refer to our docs…

read the full NocoDB overview →

About graphqlite

GraphQLite An SQLite extension that adds graph database capabilities using the Cypher query language. Store and query graph data directly in SQLite—combining the simplicity of a single file, zero config embedded database with Cypher's expressive power for modeling relationships. Installation Quick Start Features Cypher queries — MATCH, CREATE, MERGE, SET, DELETE, WITH, UNWIND, RETURN Graph algorithms — PageRank, Louvain, Dijkstra, BFS/DFS, connected components, and more Zero configuration — Works with any SQLite database, no server required Multiple bindings — Python, Rust, and raw SQL interfaces openCypher…

read the full graphqlite overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or graphqlite more popular?

NocoDB has 65,531 GitHub stars and graphqlite has 532. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and graphqlite free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and graphqlite is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and graphqlite?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and graphqlite in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or graphqlite?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,531 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose graphqlite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.