head to head · open source
NocoDB vs graphqlite
NocoDB has 65,133 GitHub stars, 5,078 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphqlite has 501 stars, 29 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 12,901% (65,133 vs 501 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; graphqlite is written in C under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, graphqlite 6%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NocoDB | graphqlite | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 501 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C |
| Last push | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 29 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NocoDB if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick graphqlite if
- You want the graphqlite feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and graphqlite fits your workflow better
About NocoDB
NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.
read the full NocoDB overview →
About graphqlite
GraphQLite is an MIT licensed SQLite extension, written in C, that adds graph database capabilities to SQLite through the Cypher query language and built in graph algorithms, and it is aimed at developers and data teams who want to store and query connected data inside an ordinary SQLite database rather than operating a separate graph server.
read the full graphqlite overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NocoDB or graphqlite more popular?
NocoDB has 65,133 GitHub stars and graphqlite has 501. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are NocoDB and graphqlite free?
Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and graphqlite is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between NocoDB and graphqlite?
NocoDB is written in TypeScript and graphqlite in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NocoDB or graphqlite?
Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,133 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose graphqlite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.