head to head · open source

NocoDB vs GoNavi

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GoNavi has 1,900 stars, 205 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 3,321% (64,998 vs 1,900 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; GoNavi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, GoNavi 11%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K GoNavi ★ 1.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB GoNavi
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 1.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 205
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick GoNavi if

  • You want the GoNavi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and GoNavi fits your workflow better

full GoNavi profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About GoNavi

GoNavi is a cross platform database client that gives developers and operations users one desktop application for many data sources. It is built with Wails in Go and React, and it targets Windows, macOS, and Linux as a desktop first tool. It is a high performance, multi data source client that is AI and MCP ready, and it avoids the Electron runtime used by many database GUIs.

read the full GoNavi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or GoNavi more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and GoNavi has 1,900. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and GoNavi free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and GoNavi is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and GoNavi?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and GoNavi in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or GoNavi?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose GoNavi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.