head to head · open source

NocoDB vs dbx

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dbx has 19,957 stars, 1,937 forks, 1,406 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoDB leads on adoption by 226% (64,998 vs 19,957 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; dbx is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, dbx 10%. dbx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K dbx ★ 20K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB dbx
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 20K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick dbx if

  • You want the dbx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and dbx fits your workflow better

full dbx profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About dbx

dbx is a roughly 25 MB cross platform database client written in Rust that connects to more than 90 databases and ships as a desktop application, a Docker container, a CLI, and a browser based web version, aimed at developers and teams who want a single lightweight tool for MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Redis, MongoDB, DuckDB, SQL Server, Dameng, and many others.

read the full dbx overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or dbx more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and dbx has 19,957. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and dbx free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and dbx is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and dbx?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and dbx in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or dbx?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose dbx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.