head to head · open source

NocoDB vs antares

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. antares has 2,650 stars, 168 forks, 150 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 2,353% (64,998 vs 2,650 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; antares is written in Vue under MIT. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, antares 6%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K antares ★ 2.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB antares
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 2.6K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Vue
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-10-14
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 168
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick antares if

  • You want the antares feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and antares fits your workflow better

full antares profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About antares

Antares SQL Client is a desktop application for working with relational databases. It is built with Electron.js and Vue.js in the JavaScript ecosystem, and it places the user interface at the center of the experience. The project targets developers needing a cross platform tool for everyday database work, including ARM systems.

read the full antares overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or antares more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and antares has 2,650. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and antares free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and antares is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and antares?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and antares in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or antares?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose antares if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.