head to head · open source

NocoDB vs age

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars, 5,054 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped yesterday. age has 4,826 stars, 523 forks, 249 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 1,247% (64,998 vs 4,826 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; age is written in C under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, age 11%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K age ★ 4.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB age
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 4.8K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 523
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick age if

  • You want the age feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and age fits your workflow better

full age profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About age

Apache AGE is an extension for PostgreSQL that adds a graph database to an existing relational database. AGE stands for A Graph Extension, and the project is inspired by Bitnine's AgensGraph, a multi model database fork of PostgreSQL. It lives in the PostgreSQL ecosystem and is written in C under the Apache 2.0 license. The core principle is a single storage layer that handles both the relational and the graph data model, so users can write standard ANSI SQL alongside openCypher, one of the most widely used graph query languages.

read the full age overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or age more popular?

NocoDB has 64,998 GitHub stars and age has 4,826. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and age free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and age is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and age?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and age in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or age?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (64,998 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose age if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.