head to head · open source

nginx vs landscape

nginx has 31,742 GitHub stars, 8,309 forks, 468 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. landscape has 1,558 stars, 121 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. nginx leads on adoption by 1,937% (31,742 vs 1,558 stars). nginx is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; landscape is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. nginx has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, landscape 8%. landscape was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nginx ★ 32K landscape ★ 1.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nginx landscape
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.6K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C Rust
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 121
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nginx if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nginx profile →

pick landscape if

  • You want the landscape feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and landscape fits your workflow better

full landscape profile →

About nginx

NGINX is the official open source repository for the NGINX web server and its load balancer, reverse proxy, API gateway and content cache roles, written in C under the BSD 2 Clause licence and aimed at system administrators, DevOps engineers and platform teams who need to serve, balance and protect their own HTTP traffic.

read the full nginx overview →

About landscape

Landscape is an open source router platform that configures a standard Linux distribution as a router by steering traffic by domain rather than IP alone, built in Rust with eBPF and aimed at self hosters who want policy routing on hardware and distributions they already control.

read the full landscape overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs nginx frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

nginx vs frp nginx vs caddy nginx vs traefik nginx vs AdGuardHome nginx vs algo nginx vs nginx-proxy nginx vs goproxy nginx vs openvpn-install nginx vs cloudflared nginx vs amnezia-client nginx vs OpenVPN nginx vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is nginx or landscape more popular?

nginx has 31,742 GitHub stars and landscape has 1,558. nginx has the larger community by that measure.

Are nginx and landscape free?

Both are open source. nginx is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and landscape under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nginx and landscape?

nginx is written in C and landscape in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nginx or landscape?

Choose nginx if you want the larger community (31,742 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose landscape if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.