head to head · open source

cloudreve vs nging

cloudreve has 28,804 GitHub stars, 3,915 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. nging has 1,594 stars, 223 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 1,707% (28,804 vs 1,594 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; nging is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, nging 14%. nging was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K nging ★ 1.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve nging
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.6K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 223
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick nging if

  • You want the nging feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and nging fits your workflow better

full nging profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About nging

Nging is a self hosted website server administration panel written in Go for sysadmins and self hosters who need to manage Caddy and Nginx sites, databases, scheduled tasks, and network tooling from one web interface across Windows, Linux, macOS, and ARM devices.

read the full nging overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or nging more popular?

cloudreve has 28,804 GitHub stars and nging has 1,594. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and nging free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and nging under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and nging?

cloudreve is written in Go and nging in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or nging?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,804 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nging if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.