head to head · open source

NetData vs Statusnook

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Statusnook has 982 stars, 31 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 1.9 years ago. NetData leads on adoption by 8,104% (80,561 vs 982 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Statusnook is written in Go under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Statusnook 3%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K Statusnook ★ 982 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData Statusnook
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 982
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2024-10-31
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick Statusnook if

  • You want the Statusnook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Statusnook fits your workflow better

full Statusnook profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About Statusnook

Statusnook is a self hosted, MIT licensed status page and endpoint monitoring tool written in Go, aimed at small teams and individual operators who want to publish service health on their own infrastructure rather than pay for a hosted status page.

read the full Statusnook overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or Statusnook more popular?

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and Statusnook has 982. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and Statusnook free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Statusnook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and Statusnook?

NetData is written in Go and Statusnook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or Statusnook?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Statusnook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.