head to head · open source

NetData vs Pulse

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pulse has 7,217 stars, 376 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. NetData leads on adoption by 1,016% (80,561 vs 7,217 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Pulse is written in Swift under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Pulse 5%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K Pulse ★ 7.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData Pulse
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 7.2K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-15
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 376
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick Pulse if

  • You want the Pulse feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Pulse fits your workflow better

full Pulse profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About Pulse

Pulse is an MIT licensed Swift logging framework for Apple platforms that records logs and URLSession network requests inside iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS apps, then displays them through SwiftUI views so developers and QA teams can inspect and share them directly from the device.

read the full Pulse overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or Pulse more popular?

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and Pulse has 7,217. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and Pulse free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pulse under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and Pulse?

NetData is written in Go and Pulse in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or Pulse?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pulse if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.