head to head · open source

NetData vs picologging

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. picologging has 780 stars, 29 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 10,229% (80,564 vs 780 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; picologging is written in Python under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, picologging 4%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K picologging ★ 780 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData picologging
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 780
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 29
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick picologging if

  • You want the picologging feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and picologging fits your workflow better

full picologging profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About picologging

Picologging is a high performance logging library for Python, published by Microsoft under the MIT licence, that works as a drop in replacement for the standard library logging module and is aimed at Python developers who want faster logging without rewriting existing logging code.

read the full picologging overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or picologging more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and picologging has 780. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and picologging free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and picologging under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and picologging?

NetData is written in Go and picologging in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or picologging?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose picologging if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.