head to head · open source
NetData vs Peekaping
NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peekaping has 1,191 stars, 69 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. NetData leads on adoption by 6,664% (80,561 vs 1,191 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Peekaping is written in Go under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Peekaping 6%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NetData | Peekaping | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-05-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.6K | ⑂ 69 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NetData if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Peekaping if
- You want the Peekaping feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Peekaping fits your workflow better
About NetData
Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.
read the full NetData overview →
About Peekaping
Peekaping is a self hosted uptime monitoring system built with Go on the server and React with TypeScript in the browser, released under the MIT license. It lives in the open source infrastructure and monitoring ecosystem as a direct alternative to Uptime Kuma, and it tracks the availability of websites, APIs, and other network services through a range of monitor types. The project ships with a web interface, status pages, and an alerting layer that can notify operators through many channels when a check fails. It is distributed primarily as Docker images and is documented at peekaping.com, with a live demo and a…
read the full Peekaping overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NetData or Peekaping more popular?
NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and Peekaping has 1,191. NetData has the larger community by that measure.
Are NetData and Peekaping free?
Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between NetData and Peekaping?
NetData is written in Go and Peekaping in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NetData or Peekaping?
Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Peekaping if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.