head to head · open source

NetData vs oshi

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped today. oshi has 5,266 stars, 916 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 1,430% (80,564 vs 5,266 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; oshi is written in Java under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, oshi 17%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K oshi ★ 5.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData oshi
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 5.3K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 916
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick oshi if

  • You want the oshi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and oshi fits your workflow better

full oshi profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About oshi

OSHI is a free, MIT licensed Java library that reads native operating system and hardware information — OS version, processes, memory and CPU usage, disks and partitions, devices, and sensors — through a single cross platform API without installing any additional native libraries.

read the full oshi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or oshi more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and oshi has 5,266. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and oshi free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and oshi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and oshi?

NetData is written in Go and oshi in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or oshi?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose oshi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.