head to head · open source

NetData vs monoscope

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. monoscope has 1,801 stars, 73 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NetData leads on adoption by 4,373% (80,561 vs 1,801 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; monoscope is written in Haskell under AGPL-3.0. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, monoscope 4%. monoscope was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K monoscope ★ 1.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData monoscope
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 1.8K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Haskell
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 73
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick monoscope if

  • You want the monoscope feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Haskell
  • You evaluated both and monoscope fits your workflow better

full monoscope profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About monoscope

Monoscope is an open source observability platform written in Haskell and licensed under AGPL 3.0. It ingests and explores logs, traces, and metrics, and stores telemetry in S3 compatible buckets. It supports OpenTelemetry ingestion and can be used as a self hosted or cloud service.

read the full monoscope overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or monoscope more popular?

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and monoscope has 1,801. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and monoscope free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and monoscope under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and monoscope?

NetData is written in Go and monoscope in Haskell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or monoscope?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose monoscope if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.