head to head · open source

NetData vs LibreHardwareMonitor

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped today. LibreHardwareMonitor has 9,084 stars, 1,015 forks, 524 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NetData leads on adoption by 787% (80,564 vs 9,084 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; LibreHardwareMonitor is written in C# under MPL-2.0. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, LibreHardwareMonitor 11%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K LibreHardwareMonitor ★ 9.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData LibreHardwareMonitor
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 9.1K
License GPL-3.0 MPL-2.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick LibreHardwareMonitor if

  • You want the LibreHardwareMonitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and LibreHardwareMonitor fits your workflow better

full LibreHardwareMonitor profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About LibreHardwareMonitor

LibreHardwareMonitor is a free, open source, MPL 2.0 licensed hardware monitoring application and .NET library that reads the temperature sensors, fan speeds, voltages, load and clock speeds of a computer's motherboard, processor, graphics cards, drives and network cards, aimed at Windows users who want that telemetry on screen and at C developers who want it inside their own applications.

read the full LibreHardwareMonitor overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or LibreHardwareMonitor more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and LibreHardwareMonitor has 9,084. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and LibreHardwareMonitor free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and LibreHardwareMonitor under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and LibreHardwareMonitor?

NetData is written in Go and LibreHardwareMonitor in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or LibreHardwareMonitor?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose LibreHardwareMonitor if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.