head to head · open source

NetData vs evo

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped today. evo has 4,316 stars, 797 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 1,767% (80,564 vs 4,316 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; evo is written in Python under GPL-3.0. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, evo 18%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K evo ★ 4.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData evo
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 4.3K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick evo if

  • You want the evo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and evo fits your workflow better

full evo profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About evo

evo is a Python package, released under the GPL 3.0 licence, that provides executables and a small library for handling, evaluating and comparing the trajectory output of odometry and SLAM algorithms, and it is aimed at robotics researchers and engineers who need to benchmark trajectories rather than maintain one evaluation script per dataset.

read the full evo overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or evo more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and evo has 4,316. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and evo free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and evo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and evo?

NetData is written in Go and evo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or evo?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose evo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.