head to head · open source
NetData vs auto-cpufreq
NetData has 81,255 GitHub stars, 6,717 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. auto-cpufreq has 7,859 stars, 360 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 934% (81,255 vs 7,859 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; auto-cpufreq is written in Python under GPL-3.0. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, auto-cpufreq 5%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (linux), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| NetData | auto-cpufreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.7K | ⑂ 360 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick NetData if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-cpufreq if
- You want the auto-cpufreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and auto-cpufreq fits your workflow better
About NetData
X Ray Vision for your infrastructure! Every Metric, Every Second. No BS. Visit our Home Page MENU: WHO WE ARE KEY FEATURES GETTING STARTED HOW IT WORKS FAQ DOCS COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTE LICENSE [!WARNING] People get addicted to Netdata. Once you use it on your systems, there's no going back. WHO WE ARE Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform. Monitor, detect, and act across your entire infrastructure. Core Advantages: Instant Insights – With Netdata you can access per second metrics and visualizations. Zero Configuration – You can deploy immediately without complex setup. ML Powered –…
read the full NetData overview →
About auto-cpufreq
auto cpufreq Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux. Actively monitors laptop battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature, and system load, ultimately allowing you to improve battery life without making any compromises. For tl;dr folks: Youtube: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Blog post: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Youtube: auto cpufreq v2.0 release & demo of all available features and options Blog post: auto cpufreq v2.0 Youtube: auto cpufreq tool demo Blog post: auto cpufreq – Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux If…
read the full auto-cpufreq overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is NetData or auto-cpufreq more popular?
NetData has 81,255 GitHub stars and auto-cpufreq has 7,859. NetData has the larger community by that measure.
Are NetData and auto-cpufreq free?
Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and auto-cpufreq under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between NetData and auto-cpufreq?
NetData is written in Go and auto-cpufreq in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, NetData or auto-cpufreq?
Choose NetData if you want the larger community (81,255 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose auto-cpufreq if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.