head to head · open source

NetData vs aspire-samples

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aspire-samples has 1,191 stars, 345 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NetData leads on adoption by 6,664% (80,564 vs 1,191 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; aspire-samples is written in C# under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, aspire-samples 29%. aspire-samples was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K aspire-samples ★ 1.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData aspire-samples
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 1.2K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 345
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick aspire-samples if

  • You want the aspire-samples feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and aspire-samples fits your workflow better

full aspire-samples profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About aspire-samples

Aspire Samples is a browsable catalogue of runnable reference applications that demonstrate how to wire front ends, APIs, containers, and databases together with Aspire, written for developers building distributed and polyglot applications who learn best from working code.

read the full aspire-samples overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or aspire-samples more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and aspire-samples has 1,191. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and aspire-samples free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and aspire-samples under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and aspire-samples?

NetData is written in Go and aspire-samples in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or aspire-samples?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose aspire-samples if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.