head to head · open source

NetData vs amplify-js

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. amplify-js has 9,561 stars, 2,174 forks, 512 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NetData leads on adoption by 743% (80,561 vs 9,561 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; amplify-js is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, amplify-js 23%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K amplify-js ★ 9.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData amplify-js
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 9.6K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick amplify-js if

  • You want the amplify-js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and amplify-js fits your workflow better

full amplify-js profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About amplify-js

AWS Amplify is a declarative JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers who build cloud enabled applications. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, published on npm as the aws amplify package under the Apache 2.0 license, and it pairs with any JavaScript based frontend workflow as well as React Native for mobile developers. The project has been developed for roughly nine years and is maintained by AWS, with its documentation hosted at docs.amplify.aws.

read the full amplify-js overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or amplify-js more popular?

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and amplify-js has 9,561. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and amplify-js free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and amplify-js under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and amplify-js?

NetData is written in Go and amplify-js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or amplify-js?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose amplify-js if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.