head to head · open source

mediamtx vs xiu

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars, 2,374 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xiu has 2,331 stars, 239 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 765% (20,170 vs 2,331 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; xiu is written in Rust under MIT. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, xiu 10%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (hls, media-server, rtmp, rtmp-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mediamtx ★ 20K xiu ★ 2.3K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

mediamtx xiu
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 2.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-03-07
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 239
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mediamtx if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mediamtx profile →

pick xiu if

  • You want the xiu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and xiu fits your workflow better

full xiu profile →

About mediamtx

MediaMTX is a ready to use, zero dependency live media server and media proxy written in Go, aimed at anyone who needs to publish, read, proxy, record and play back real time video and audio streams across many protocols without standing up a heavy media platform.

read the full mediamtx overview →

About xiu

Xiu is an open source live media server written in pure Rust under the MIT license. It supports RTMP, RTSP, WebRTC through Whip and Whep, HTTP FLV, and HLS, and it runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows. It belongs to the Rust media server ecosystem and targets live audio and video distribution.

read the full xiu overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime go2rtc vs streama next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs CloudFlare-ImgBed mediamtx vs Node-Media-Server mediamtx vs Lychee mediamtx vs seanime mediamtx vs Piwigo mediamtx vs nginx-http-flv-module mediamtx vs foss_photo_libraries mediamtx vs tubesync mediamtx vs UniversalMediaServer

Frequently asked questions

Is mediamtx or xiu more popular?

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars and xiu has 2,331. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.

Are mediamtx and xiu free?

Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and xiu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mediamtx and xiu?

mediamtx is written in Go and xiu in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mediamtx or xiu?

Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xiu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.