head to head · open source

mediamtx vs manyfold

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars, 2,374 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. manyfold has 2,165 stars, 142 forks, 520 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mediamtx leads on adoption by 832% (20,170 vs 2,165 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; manyfold is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, manyfold 7%. manyfold was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mediamtx ★ 20K manyfold ★ 2.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

mediamtx manyfold
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 2.2K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 142
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mediamtx if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mediamtx profile →

pick manyfold if

  • You want the manyfold feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and manyfold fits your workflow better

full manyfold profile →

About mediamtx

MediaMTX is a ready to use, zero dependency live media server and media proxy written in Go, aimed at anyone who needs to publish, read, proxy, record and play back real time video and audio streams across many protocols without standing up a heavy media platform.

read the full mediamtx overview →

About manyfold

Manyfold is an open source, self hosted web application for managing a collection of 3D models, with a particular focus on 3D printing. It lives in the digital asset management ecosystem and is written in Ruby on Rails under the AGPL 3.0 license. The project targets users who want to keep their own library of printable model files rather than relying on a third party service.

read the full manyfold overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime go2rtc vs streama next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs CloudFlare-ImgBed mediamtx vs Node-Media-Server mediamtx vs Lychee mediamtx vs seanime mediamtx vs Piwigo mediamtx vs nginx-http-flv-module mediamtx vs foss_photo_libraries mediamtx vs tubesync mediamtx vs UniversalMediaServer

Frequently asked questions

Is mediamtx or manyfold more popular?

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars and manyfold has 2,165. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.

Are mediamtx and manyfold free?

Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and manyfold under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mediamtx and manyfold?

mediamtx is written in Go and manyfold in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mediamtx or manyfold?

Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose manyfold if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.