head to head · open source

DBeaver vs lowdb

DBeaver has 51,814 GitHub stars, 4,374 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lowdb has 22,580 stars, 962 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 129% (51,814 vs 22,580 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; lowdb is written in JavaScript under MIT. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, lowdb 4%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K lowdb ★ 23K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver lowdb
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 23K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-03-27
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 962
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick lowdb if

  • You want the lowdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and lowdb fits your workflow better

full lowdb profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About lowdb

lowdb is a small, MIT licensed embedded JSON database for JavaScript and TypeScript that persists data to a plain db.json file, aimed at Node.js, Electron, and browser projects that need local storage without running a database server.

read the full lowdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or lowdb more popular?

DBeaver has 51,814 GitHub stars and lowdb has 22,580. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and lowdb free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lowdb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and lowdb?

DBeaver is written in Java and lowdb in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or lowdb?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,814 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lowdb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.