head to head · open source

Linkwarden vs Brace.to

Linkwarden has 19,787 GitHub stars, 845 forks, 662 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Brace.to has 106 stars, 4 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Linkwarden leads on adoption by 18,567% (19,787 vs 106 stars). Linkwarden is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Brace.to is written in TypeScript under MIT. Linkwarden has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Brace.to 4%. Linkwarden was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (bookmark-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Linkwarden ★ 20K Brace.to ★ 106 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Linkwarden Brace.to
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 106
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-04-13
Forks ⑂ 845 ⑂ 4
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Linkwarden if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Linkwarden profile →

pick Brace.to if

  • You want the Brace.to feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Brace.to fits your workflow better

full Brace.to profile →

About Linkwarden

Linkwarden is an open source, self hosted collaborative bookmark manager written in TypeScript, with a Next.js web interface and React Native mobile applications. It lives in the self hosted productivity and content management ecosystem, where users need a durable place to collect webpages, articles, and links instead of leaving them scattered across browser bookmarks, notes, and feeds.

read the full Linkwarden overview →

About Brace.to

Brace.to is an MIT licensed, end to end encrypted bookmark manager for people who want to save and revisit links across web, Android and iOS without handing the contents of their library to a hosted provider.

read the full Brace.to overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs linkwarden linkwarden vs wallabag linkwarden vs linkding karakeep vs wallabag karakeep vs linkding karakeep vs ryot karakeep vs seriesguide karakeep vs showly n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Linkwarden vs Karakeep Linkwarden vs Wallabag Linkwarden vs Linkding Linkwarden vs Ryot Linkwarden vs SeriesGuide Linkwarden vs Showly Linkwarden vs Faved Linkwarden vs Tonkatsu Box Linkwarden vs Bookmark It Linkwarden vs Readeck Linkwarden vs Cloudmark Linkwarden vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Linkwarden or Brace.to more popular?

Linkwarden has 19,787 GitHub stars and Brace.to has 106. Linkwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are Linkwarden and Brace.to free?

Both are open source. Linkwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Brace.to under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Linkwarden and Brace.to?

Linkwarden is written in TypeScript and Brace.to in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Linkwarden or Brace.to?

Choose Linkwarden if you want the larger community (19,787 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Brace.to if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.