head to head · open source

Karakeep vs Ryot

Karakeep has 29,110 GitHub stars, 1,516 forks, 726 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ryot has 3,597 stars, 129 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Karakeep leads on adoption by 709% (29,110 vs 3,597 stars). Karakeep is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Ryot is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Karakeep has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Ryot 4%. Ryot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Karakeep ★ 29K Ryot ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Karakeep Ryot
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 3.6K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Karakeep if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Karakeep profile →

pick Ryot if

  • You want the Ryot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Ryot fits your workflow better

full Ryot profile →

About Karakeep

Karakeep is a self hostable bookmark and content management application designed for users who collect links, notes, images, and PDFs across devices. It originated as Hoarder and evolved into a full featured tool for personal knowledge management, with strong emphasis on AI assisted organization and long term content preservation. Built with Next.js, it runs in the web browser and mobile apps, supporting both local and cloud hosted AI models.

read the full Karakeep overview →

About Ryot

Ryot (Roll Your Own Tracker) is a self hosted platform for tracking media consumption and fitness activity, aimed at people who want their tracking data kept on their own hardware instead of in someone else's account.

read the full Ryot overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs linkwarden karakeep vs wallabag karakeep vs linkding karakeep vs seriesguide karakeep vs showly linkwarden vs wallabag linkwarden vs linkding n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Karakeep vs Linkwarden Karakeep vs Wallabag Karakeep vs Linkding Karakeep vs SeriesGuide Karakeep vs Showly Karakeep vs Faved Karakeep vs Tonkatsu Box Karakeep vs Bookmark It Karakeep vs Readeck Karakeep vs Brace.to Karakeep vs Cloudmark Karakeep vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Karakeep or Ryot more popular?

Karakeep has 29,110 GitHub stars and Ryot has 3,597. Karakeep has the larger community by that measure.

Are Karakeep and Ryot free?

Both are open source. Karakeep is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ryot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Karakeep and Ryot?

Karakeep is written in TypeScript and Ryot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Karakeep or Ryot?

Choose Karakeep if you want the larger community (29,110 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ryot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.