head to head · open source

Linkwarden vs Ryot

Linkwarden has 19,787 GitHub stars, 845 forks, 662 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Ryot has 3,597 stars, 129 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Linkwarden leads on adoption by 450% (19,787 vs 3,597 stars). Linkwarden is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Ryot is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Linkwarden has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Ryot 4%. Ryot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Linkwarden ★ 20K Ryot ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Linkwarden Ryot
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 3.6K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 845 ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Linkwarden if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Linkwarden profile →

pick Ryot if

  • You want the Ryot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Ryot fits your workflow better

full Ryot profile →

About Linkwarden

Linkwarden is an open source, self hosted collaborative bookmark manager written in TypeScript, with a Next.js web interface and React Native mobile applications. It lives in the self hosted productivity and content management ecosystem, where users need a durable place to collect webpages, articles, and links instead of leaving them scattered across browser bookmarks, notes, and feeds.

read the full Linkwarden overview →

About Ryot

Ryot (Roll Your Own Tracker) is a self hosted platform for tracking media consumption and fitness activity, aimed at people who want their tracking data kept on their own hardware instead of in someone else's account.

read the full Ryot overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs linkwarden linkwarden vs wallabag karakeep vs ryot linkwarden vs linkding karakeep vs wallabag karakeep vs linkding karakeep vs seriesguide karakeep vs showly n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Linkwarden vs Karakeep Linkwarden vs Wallabag Linkwarden vs Linkding Linkwarden vs SeriesGuide Linkwarden vs Showly Linkwarden vs Faved Linkwarden vs Tonkatsu Box Linkwarden vs Bookmark It Linkwarden vs Readeck Linkwarden vs Brace.to Linkwarden vs Cloudmark Linkwarden vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Linkwarden or Ryot more popular?

Linkwarden has 19,787 GitHub stars and Ryot has 3,597. Linkwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are Linkwarden and Ryot free?

Both are open source. Linkwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ryot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Linkwarden and Ryot?

Linkwarden is written in TypeScript and Ryot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Linkwarden or Ryot?

Choose Linkwarden if you want the larger community (19,787 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ryot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.