head to head · open source

kong vs terravision

kong has 44,235 GitHub stars, 5,222 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. terravision has 1,640 stars, 176 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kong leads on adoption by 2,597% (44,235 vs 1,640 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; terravision is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, terravision 11%. terravision was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K terravision ★ 1.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong terravision
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Lua Python
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick terravision if

  • You want the terravision feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and terravision fits your workflow better

full terravision profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About terravision

TerraVision is a free, open source cloud architecture diagram generator for AWS, Azure and Google Cloud that works in both directions — from an AI prompt or Terraform code to a diagram, and from a diagram to Terraform — for cloud architects, platform engineers and infrastructure as code practitioners.

read the full terravision overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs kubernetes kong vs Docker kong vs portainer kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs Pulumi kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or terravision more popular?

kong has 44,235 GitHub stars and terravision has 1,640. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and terravision free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and terravision under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and terravision?

kong is written in Lua and terravision in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or terravision?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,235 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose terravision if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.