head to head · open source
kong vs pytest-testinfra
kong has 44,348 GitHub stars, 5,238 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. pytest-testinfra has 2,480 stars, 358 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. kong leads on adoption by 1,688% (44,348 vs 2,480 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; pytest-testinfra is written in Python under Apache-2.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, pytest-testinfra 14%. kong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (devops, kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| kong | pytest-testinfra | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Lua | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-07-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 358 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick kong if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Lua
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pytest-testinfra if
- You want the pytest-testinfra feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and pytest-testinfra fits your workflow better
About kong
[![][kong logo]][kong url] [![Build Status][badge action image]][badge action url] Kong or Kong Gateway is a cloud native, platform agnostic, scalable API 𖧹 LLM 𖧹 MCP Gateway distinguished for its high performance and extensibility via plugins. It also provides advanced AI traffic capabilities with multi LLM support, semantic security, MCP traffic security and analytics, and more. By providing functionality for proxying, routing, load balancing, health checking, authentication (and more), Kong serves as the central layer for orchestrating microservices or conventional API traffic and agentic LLM and MCP as…
About pytest-testinfra
Testinfra test your infrastructure Latest documentation: .. important:: Maintenance Notice This project is currently not actively maintained , and responses to issues or pull requests may be delayed for several months . Please consider this when using the project and feel free to contribute via pull requests, which will be reviewed as time permits. Thank you for your understanding! About ===== With Testinfra you can write unit tests in Python to test actual state of your servers configured by management tools like Salt , Ansible , Puppet , Chef and so on. Testinfra aims to be a Serverspec equivalent in python…
read the full pytest-testinfra overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is kong or pytest-testinfra more popular?
kong has 44,348 GitHub stars and pytest-testinfra has 2,480. kong has the larger community by that measure.
Are kong and pytest-testinfra free?
Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pytest-testinfra under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between kong and pytest-testinfra?
kong is written in Lua and pytest-testinfra in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, kong or pytest-testinfra?
Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,348 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pytest-testinfra if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.