head to head · open source

kong vs mirrord

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. mirrord has 5,333 stars, 215 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped today. kong leads on adoption by 728% (44,148 vs 5,333 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; mirrord is written in Rust under MIT. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, mirrord 4%. mirrord was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cloud-native), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K mirrord ★ 5.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong mirrord
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 5.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Lua Rust
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 215
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick mirrord if

  • You want the mirrord feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and mirrord fits your workflow better

full mirrord profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About mirrord

mirrord is an MIT licensed Rust tool that runs any process, on a developer's machine or inside an AI coding agent's environment, as if it were a pod in a live Kubernetes cluster, with real environment variables, DNS, network, and traffic.

read the full mirrord overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or mirrord more popular?

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars and mirrord has 5,333. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and mirrord free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mirrord under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and mirrord?

kong is written in Lua and mirrord in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or mirrord?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,148 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mirrord if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.