head to head · open source
kong vs laravel-backup
kong has 44,348 GitHub stars, 5,238 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. laravel-backup has 6,027 stars, 783 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 636% (44,348 vs 6,027 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; laravel-backup is written in PHP under MIT. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, laravel-backup 13%. laravel-backup was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| kong | laravel-backup | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 6.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Lua | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 783 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick kong if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Lua
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick laravel-backup if
- You want the laravel-backup feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and laravel-backup fits your workflow better
About kong
[![][kong logo]][kong url] [![Build Status][badge action image]][badge action url] Kong or Kong Gateway is a cloud native, platform agnostic, scalable API 𖧹 LLM 𖧹 MCP Gateway distinguished for its high performance and extensibility via plugins. It also provides advanced AI traffic capabilities with multi LLM support, semantic security, MCP traffic security and analytics, and more. By providing functionality for proxying, routing, load balancing, health checking, authentication (and more), Kong serves as the central layer for orchestrating microservices or conventional API traffic and agentic LLM and MCP as…
About laravel-backup
A modern backup solution for Laravel apps This Laravel package creates a backup of your application. The backup is a zip file that contains all files in the directories you specify along with a dump of your database. The backup can be stored on any of the filesystems you have configured in Laravel. Feeling paranoid about backups? No problem! You can backup your application to multiple filesystems at once. Once installed taking a backup of your files and databases is very easy. Just issue this artisan command: But we didn't stop there. The package also provides a backup monitor to check the health of your…
read the full laravel-backup overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is kong or laravel-backup more popular?
kong has 44,348 GitHub stars and laravel-backup has 6,027. kong has the larger community by that measure.
Are kong and laravel-backup free?
Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and laravel-backup under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between kong and laravel-backup?
kong is written in Lua and laravel-backup in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, kong or laravel-backup?
Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,348 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose laravel-backup if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.