head to head · open source

kong vs itamae

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. itamae has 1,132 stars, 118 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 3,800% (44,148 vs 1,132 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; itamae is written in Ruby under MIT. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, itamae 10%. itamae was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K itamae ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong itamae
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Lua Ruby
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 118
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick itamae if

  • You want the itamae feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and itamae fits your workflow better

full itamae profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About itamae

Simple and lightweight configuration management tool inspired by Chef. CHANGELOG Concept Chef like DSL (but not compatible with Chef) Simpler and lighter weight than Chef Only recipes Idempotent Installation Getting Started Create a recipe file as recipe.rb : And then execute itamae command to apply a recipe to a local machine. Or you can apply a recipe to a remote machine by itamae ssh . You can also apply a recipe to Vagrant VM by itamae ssh vagrant . You can find further information to use Itamae on Itamae Wiki. Enjoy! Documentation Run tests Requirements: Vagrant Get Involved Join Slack team Presentations / A…

read the full itamae overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or itamae more popular?

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars and itamae has 1,132. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and itamae free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and itamae under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and itamae?

kong is written in Lua and itamae in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or itamae?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,148 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose itamae if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.